Jcapler
Speedy deletion of Propertynut.com
edit
A tag has been placed on Propertynut.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AWeenieMan (talk) 21:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Propertynut.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Your new company
editHi there. You need to remember that Wikipedia is an encylopaedia - not the yellow pages. Just because you have started a new company does not mean it satisfies the criteria of notability to enable it to be worthy of conclusion. My suggestion? Don't try adding the company - if it's new, the chances of it being notable are slim. If it does become notable, leave it - someone else will write an article about it soon enough! I'd suggest you also read WP:Autobiography and WP:Spam to get some clue as to why your addition was deleted. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 22:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)