Talk pages

edit

This is with respect to message left by you. I didn't want to comment about this in the discussion itself, and I know you don't mean it, but please be aware of WP:SHOUT: CAPITAL LETTERS are considered shouting and are very rarely appropriate". I hope this helps. - Sanyam.wikime (talk) 14:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jaswant Singh4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Karni Sena did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  NitinMlk (talk) 20:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for providing sources. But neither of the articles mentions that she was born in Marwar – they only state that her temple is situated there. Similarly, "warrior sage" claim is also unsourced. So I have removed those details. BTW, the birthplace-related details of Karni Mata do not belong to the lead section of Karni Sena. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Talk:Kanika Kapoor#tantrums

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Kanika Kapoor#tantrums. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Kanika Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —usernamekiran (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I gave logical explaination at Talk:Kanika Kapoor#tantrums. You are well aware about the discussion, as you commented there, and I pinged you in all my responses. If you remove any content without getting a consensus, you might get blocked. —usernamekiran (talk) 23:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Help in expanding 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Rajasthan

edit

Hi, Kindly help expanding article 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Rajasthan . This article is newly created and needs more editors to expand it. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. - Mayankj429 (talk) 19:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

I had told, and warned you about this very specific issue a few days back. We also had discussion about it at Talk:Kanika Kapoor. Yet you have done exactly the same thing again with this edit. If you do it again, you will surely get blocked. There are no "hoaxes" in the article, nor the article is biased like you claimed in edit summary. They are plain facts. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Sushant Singh Rajput Signature.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Sushant Singh Rajput Signature.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Sushant_Singh_Rajput_Signature.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply