License tagging for Image:Fd 1.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Fd 1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

First World Problems

edit

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article First World Problems, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rossheth | Talk to me 14:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of First World Problems

edit

I've nominated First World Problems, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that First World Problems satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First World Problems and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of First World Problems during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Iknowyourider (t c) 15:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jasonstrohl (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You blocked my IP address for a period of one year due to "Coordinated Vandalism" of the first world problems page. The entry, while lighthearted in tone at first, slowly became a coordinated effort to explain a term commonly used in English vernacular to describe (and often put down) a person who complains about issues that are generally trivial when viewed from a global perspective. The effort was indeed coordinated through an internet messageboard, but was not what I consider to be vandalism. If you disagree with this assertation, that is fine, and I will review wiki's policies on the creations of entries, but I would ask that you kindly unblock my IP address. Thank you for your consideration.

Decline reason:

Your "assertations" make no sense. The block for heavy meatpuppetry is endorsed. — Sandstein 18:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.