Comments by jamesfree

edit

Page 1 of 1

Posted on November 21 at 4:33 p.m.

I'm a middle-aged Baton Rouge ex-pat -- born there, raised there, educated there . . . and gone for good since 1988.

I now live in Omaha, Neb., where government generally works and people generally care. This gives an ex-pat a certain perspective on Louisiana (and Baton Rouge).

That perspective is that all of the hopes and dreams of the "movers and shakers" -- those pie-in-the-sky visions Baton Rougeans are subjected to every few years -- will continue to be stillborn until PEOPLE GENERALLY CARE and insist that GOVERNMENT GENERALLY WORK.

Why, oh WHY, would any major corporation ever move into BR and subject its employees, and its bottom line, to Baton Rouge's and Louisiana's broken civic culture, broken public education and crumbling infrastructure?

Every time I go home for a visit, it strikes me how all of my old haunts look just a little bit more like something found in greater Port-au-Prince, as opposed to something in greater Omaha. Omaha is decidedly a First World city; Baton Rouge now strikes me as high-functioning Third World.

And it breaks my heart to see, via the Internet, what has become of my alma mater, Baton Rouge Magnet High. If the crumbling facilities I see is the "flagship" high school of the area, Lord spare me from seeing the rest.

For a view, go to:

http://revolution-21.blogspot.com/2006/1...

Also:

http://www.brhsalumniassoc.org/photos.ht...

Today, it came to me what the difference between living up here and living down there is.

Living up here and looking back on Louisiana is like watching a loved one holding a pistol to his head but not being able to stop him from pulling the trigger. Living in Louisiana is like having your loved one hold the pistol to YOUR head but not being able to stop him from pulling the trigger.

On Portraits of Baton Rouge Now…Love it, Leave it or Change it.

Page 1 of 1


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Baton Rouge High 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Baton_Rouge_High_13.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baton_Rouge_High_13.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

About stuff

edit

Wikipedia:NOT - Wikipedia is NOT a soapbox. Also, how do we know the images that you took are really from those schools, and how do we know they are still in effect? What you did is Wikipedia:Original research and that is totally unacceptable.

If you want to say "The maintenance is terrible" go find a journalist who can cover the story. Then when a story is made then Wikipedia can document it. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:BRMHS classroom wall 2.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:BRMHS balcony entrance.JPG

edit
 

The file File:BRMHS balcony entrance.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low res / poor quality, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 1989 (talk) 22:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:BRMHS classroom wall 1.JPG

edit
 

The file File:BRMHS classroom wall 1.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply