Usertalk jaimebakrJaimebakr (talk) 17:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Octagon Worldwide edit

It seems article-worthy to me ... the article shows why we should care about the company and what is important about it., and therefore it shouldn't be speedy deleted as it is now. Can you add a couple of examples of these "blue chip corporate consultancy clients"? Maybe the biggest ones. Also you might want to add a company infobox to the article, where you can state the key facts of the company. I can't think of much else ... I don't deal with company articles very often. Graham87 10:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spikes issue1 cover.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Spikes issue1 cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply