New articles

edit

Hey there. Thought you should know that articles should highlight the title in bold. '''NickelShoe''' yields NickelShoe. See Wikipedia:Guide to layout.

Also, try to place articles in categories, to list them with related articles. At the bottom of the article, add [[Category:American musicians]] or whatever, and when previewing, check at the bottom of the page (beneath the edit box) to make sure the links are blue.

(It's not like you'll get banned for not doing these things, but when the original author does them, it's less work for others, and probably more accurate.)

Thanks! NickelShoe 01:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Rachelhaden.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Rachelhaden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Lord Nasty

edit
 

Lord Nasty, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lord Nasty satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Nasty and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lord Nasty during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mercury 03:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Lord Nasty (2nd nomination)

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lord Nasty, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Nasty (2nd nomination). Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Hi Jackbunny2006!
We thank you for uploading Image:Virgil.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Zac Holtzman

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zac Holtzman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable musician, no references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Jackbunny2006! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 873 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. John Tynan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:AtomEllis.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AtomEllis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Johntynan.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Johntynan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)Reply