Jack Patern (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am talking with WJBscribe's bosses to explain why WJB is being completely unreasonable. I should be able to do this. If unblocked, I won't edit for a month or pending resolution with WJBscribe's bosses.............If you look at WJBscribe's talk page, he is blocking me as a sock based solely on the complaint of David Dial, who is editing warring. I made a very good edit and DavidDial, who has a sock named DD2K, just removed with the excuse "For Pete's Sake" which is rubbish...no explanation, just a sarcastic comment. So DavidDial did not want my good edit and he just told WJBscribe "this person is a sock". If you can accuse people like that, block yourself on the excuse that I say you are a sock. I am being treated very badly.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.