J K Stone

May 2017

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. [1] MrOllie (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Threesome. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Threesome was changed by J K Stone (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908362 on 2017-05-11T20:12:34+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Threesome. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Threesome. DVdm (talk) 20:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Threesome. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Also, the link you have twice added to articles does not seem to serve any purpose where you placed it, which may give editors the impression that you are posting it to publicise the web site it links to, which is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. If you think there are good reasons for adding the link then please explain what those reasons are. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I was not trying to get in an edit war. I didn't realize my edit's were being automatically reverted. I was trying to add content I thought was appropriate to the discussion of threesomes. This is my first time editing. I apologize for any errors I have caused.J K Stone (talk) 20:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)