JGallagher83

Your submission at Articles for creation: Velpula Sarayu has been accepted

Velpula Sarayu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Suhas18891995 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fostera12. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 04:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Brahmagupta, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Understood. JGallagher83 (talk) 08:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

block appea

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JGallagher83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had made another account a while back that I forgot about. I was not attempting to do anything illegitimate or evade blocks. I will not use any other accounts. I apologize for this JGallagher83 (talk) 06:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You'll need to return to your original account and request unblock there, or at least explain why you can't and address the reasons for your original block. 331dot (talk) 06:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

appeal request

Hello. I attempted to appeal from the original account but the appeal was not going through. I had multiple usernames associated with my account and had forgotten about the first one. I accidentally uploaded several image files on wikipedia commons which were under copyright. I will not do this again. I was also rash with some edits and will be careful going forward so as to not cause any issues. JGallagher83 (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

You need to make a new unblock request, as you did the first one. You should list all the accounts you have. 331dot (talk) 12:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JGallagher83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've looked into wikipedias rules and guideline and realize I made a mistake. I'm committed to using my account responsibly. JGallagher83 (talk) 18:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not followed the directions given you by 331dot. Yamla (talk) 13:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've requested unblock from the original account