Welcome to Wikipedia! edit

Dear JBGM: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!  --mms (talk) 22:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

re: your edits to An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge edit

Hello, thanks for getting in touch. The reason why I removed your recent additions to the article An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge is because the "sources" you provide do not satisfy WP:RS. The edit makes a connection between An Occurrence and several other stories. However, the cited links do not support the information; rather, they are the stories themselves. Nowhere in these links is a connection made between An Occurrence and these other stories, so what you have introduced into the article is original research by synthesis. This means that you have "combine[d] material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." In order for this information to be included in the article, you need to provide reliable, secondary sources that make the connection between An Occurrence and these other works of literature. Until then, this information does not belong on Wikipedia. I hope this helps, María (yllosubmarine) 02:01, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

The reason why I removed your addition twice before is, like I stated above, you had no reliable sources to back up your claim. Just be more careful in future, and you should be okay. You cannot use other Wikis as sources (they are user generated, so not reliable), and you cannot make your own conclusions based on primary sources (that's original research). Evans (2003) does mention Jorge Luis Borges in conjunction with Bierce's story, but not Don Juan Manuel. Unless you can provide a reliable source regarding Manuel's connection to Bierce, its inclusion remains OR; Borges' story is also not mentioned by name. María (yllosubmarine) 18:29, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Note: I've added [citation needed] tags where references should go once they are located. I've removed the external links to the primary sources because not only are ELs not allowed in the main part of an article per the Manual of Style, but these literary works already have Wiki articles. Proper references (which make the connection between Bierce and the other authors) should utilize the <ref> tag. María (yllosubmarine) 18:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply