User talk:IvoShandor/2010 archives/September 2010
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
oopz
What means this "oopz" in this edit summary? Can it be interpreted as nomination whitdrawn? Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah. I was just looking at some of the newer features around here and accidentally submitted an AfD for that article, though I didn't mean to. Though I had fixed it all by reversion, but I guess not. IvoShandor (talk) 07:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |
The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Equatorial room has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Seems like a non-notable adjective-noun combination.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jason Quinn (talk) 02:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)