May I know the reason for removing the picture from Pooja Sharma (TV Actress) article. --Teampoojasharma (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
@Teampoojasharma (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks for your contribution and welcome. I remove the picture because is was a promotional kit of the serial it does not look standarad in that article. It is better that you upload a common file for the actress's page that would be more prefereble.Ishi2345 (talk)
- @Ishi2345: Hi! I agree with you. But, at present no common file or copyright-free image is available. For convenient of users in identifying the article subject, poster art used for WP article 'Ruk Jaana Nahin' was used on 'fair use' term. By the way the image on the poster art is that of the actress. If you agree with my proposal will you kindly revert the image edit for the sake of users. Thank you in anticipation. --Teampoojasharma (talk) 15:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
@Teampoojasharma (talk) 15:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks for replying me I understand your concern. A second ago I check the license of the poster and the poster clearly state that it is used for critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustration so using this poster possibly violate copyright of wikipedia. The poster's purpose of the use state:-
Main infobox. The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work, product or service for which it serves as poster art. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing the work, to show the primary visual image associated with the work, and to help the user quickly identify the work, product or service and know they have found what they are looking for. Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the creator providing graphic design services, and in turn the marketing of the promoted item.
Plz u also check the license if I am wrong then let me know.
And I want to inform you that there are many article in wikipedia without a image it does not create any problem in identification but if u still want to upload a picture then u can upload it by u r own. Thank again for u r contribution Ishi2345 (talk)
- @Ishi2345: Thanks for your well explained reply. I agree with you and will not do any copyright violation. I am very sorry to say that your action of nominating the article itself for deletion is not a bit harder. If possible please reconsider your decision. Thank you again for your valuable reply --Teampoojasharma (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
@I am really very sorry Teampoojasharma (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC) if you feel that I nominate the article for copyright violation. I nominate the article because it was written from a fan's point of view rather then neutral point of view. The article was violating neutral point of view of wikipedia for this reason I nominate the article for deletion nothing else if I hurt you then I am asking for uour forgiveness. Ishi2345 (talk)
- @Ishi2345: Thank you for your reply. I rectified and improved the article for making it more neutral and fit for Wikipedia. Please go through it once and do further edit if necessary. Thank you again in anticipation of your cooperation. --Teampoojasharma (talk) 19:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)