Hi Ishium, regarding Gonzaga College and the paragraph about its fees, please note that synthesis of published material is specifically disallowed in Wikipedia articles. The new references did not, as far as I could see, mention Gonzaga college at all, they only provided a source for the fees at Cambridge University. Fees at other schools and universities around the world are irrelevant to the article about this school unless there is a source that has made the comparison already. Hope this makes sense. --bonadea contributions talk 05:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The comparison offers a perspective on the size of the fee by comparison with the best education money can buy elsewhere (Cambridge being accorded best in the world status). Ischium (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2012

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Gonzaga College, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 20:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Gonzaga College, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

The information you add is not sourced. The source does not mention Gonzaga College at all. Please respect Wikipedia's policies concerning original research. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Ischium. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply