Wikipedia

Internetguide

Joined 28 May 2008
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Beetstra in topic External links

May 2008 edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Jobs for America's Graduates do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://www.reliablemoney.blogspot.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Daniel Lyons constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Rettetast (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


January 2009 edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago9 comments4 people in discussion

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Underworld: Rise of the Lycans, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Hotel for Dogs (film) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bfilmtaka\.com\b (links: http://www.filmtaka.com/2009/01/hotel-for-dogs.html/).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:35, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
W

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Internetguide (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked by contributing adding external links. In my appeal i want to say that, all links which i include have a movie trailers, all my external links did not violate the policy of wikipedia & other site, if you see, if you see the link - filmtaka.com/2009/01/hotel-for-dogs.html has a trailer of this movie & i add this link, to "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotel_for_Dogs_(film)" this of wikipedia in external link column, so how can i voilate the wikipedia,

Decline reason:

It does violate quite some of our policies and guidelines: per the external links guideline, the information should add to the page, and preferably used as a reference; also there, links to videos are depracated, as they are not suitable for readers with slow internet connections, or for people who may not have the necessery codecs to actually see the content. WP:NOT#REPOSITORY/WP:NOT#DIRECTORY says that we are not an internet directory or a linkfarm, we are writing an encyclopedia here (external links should be kept to a minimum). Furthermore, our conflict of interest guideline strongly advises to not add links to sites you own yourself. You were using multiple accounts to still being able to add links (see WP:SOCK). Also, most trailers are also available from the official site of the movie (which should be linked per the external links guideline), and which is certainly a better place to link to. Should I go on? --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.



 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Internetguide (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im new in editing wikipedia pages, so i did not understand which link has to be added where, so i use external link column, as you say these links can be added in reference section, so now onwards i add these types of links in reference section. the links to the videos is the high quality videos & clear copy of movie tralier, which is suitable for those readers who like to watch trailer in HD quality. yes i use multiple accounts because as i told you, im new in wikipedia, so when this account is blocked, so i feel to make new account is better choice. now i read the policies of wikipedia & this type of mistake did not happen in future, i didn't appeal here to revert my edits, but please unblock my account & the website filmtaka.com which i add in external link section. so i can contribute in wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I think you don't understand that he meant that you can't put your film trailor links into external links but that links to the movie website itself would be suitable. IF filmtaka.com is your website then you have a conflict of interest which is strongly discouraged. Using multiple accounts to add links violates WP:SOCK and is strongly discouraged. — Sandahl (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I am accepting to unblock, assuming good faith from your side. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request handled by: Dirk Beetstra T C 15:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

You requested to be unblocked, and I assumed good faith from your side. However, you proceed in doing exactly what you were asked not to do, hence:

 
W

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 19:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Internetguide (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not do anything which violate the terms of wikipedia, I dont know the website which i try to add in reference is still blacklisted, I try to add the reference only a single time not again & again, & when i receive the message that the website is blacklisted than i appeal to unblock this website.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked before, and this time indefinitely, for repeatedly adding the same website link to articles. You simply don't seem to have gotten the message and, per the block notice, are simply spamming the site. You need to address in unblock requests the reason you were blocked which you have not done here. Peripitus (Talk) 05:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

External links edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 19:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Internetguide&oldid=756107825"