Next edit

Hey edit

No problem with that. Kwsn (Ni!) 05:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Waterboarding page & torture edit

In regards to your comments on the talk page opposing unprotection, you might want to read what I just posted. As there is not one single source saying that waterboarding isn't torture, I threw down a polite policy gauntlet. I really do think its fine to downgrade to semi-protection. If anyone tries to edit war in unsupported views that are incompatible with Wikipedia policies, they'll be up against a WP:3RR wall pretty fast I think when everyone and their cousin reverts them out. Lawrence Cohen 16:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

See my reply in the oppose. Thx for all the work Inertia Tensor 23:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lawrence for admin edit

I saw your comment. I agree that Lawrence has shown himself to be an excellent editor that helps to resolve difficult problems (as shown on the waterboarding article). I would fully support his nomination to Admin.Remember (talk) 20:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Horrible job, ball and chain, but he's welcome to it, we need people like that! Inertia Tensor 20:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)\Reply
Idea.. We could push it NOW, as it will also have the tangible benefit of having a large number of admins going over Waterboarding. Right now - for ages, Chaser has been babysitting the fighting. Inertia Tensor 20:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I definitely like the idea if it actually gets more high quality editors to participate in resolving the waterboarding issue. Remember (talk) 20:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just noticed this when I came to post a question for IT. I'm completely flattered, thank you... Lawrence Cohen 00:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

You have gathered a lot of admirers with your work on WB, especially as you were an active participant. You have also grown and learnt tremendously as an editor since this conflict began. You are also showing admin restraint, which is an entirely different skill and job than as an editor. WIki needs admins who can step back from teh breech on a subject they themselves are opinionated about. There's precious few of them. Stand - off admins are two a penny. Inertia Tensor (talk) 11:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Archiving on talk:waterboarding edit

I'm trying to clean up the page, since we have active sections mixed into wide swathes of inactive ones. You weren't happy the last time I tried to archive this section. It sort of seems to have sputtered out. Would you object if I kicked it over to the new archive 4 page? I want to try to get it down to just the main sections there is still a need to completely get consensus on. Lawrence Cohen 00:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, you are playing a blinder - let rip. See my latest vote on Ka-Ping Yee's version and comments lower. Thanks for asking!!!! Inertia Tensor (talk) 11:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstars for all edit

  The Barnstar of Peace
For your work in helping to promote discussion and consensus related to the waterboarding article in a construction manner, I award you this Barnstar of peace. Thanks for all of your hard work. Remember (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

User name edit

If you would like to abbreviate my username again in the future, please note that it does not begin with the letters "Bag." Thank you. Badagnani (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lol sorry, fast typing! Inertia Tensor (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Fixed Inertia Tensor (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I did the same thing before. Sorry again! Lawrence Cohen 04:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding edit

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny 16:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

FYI: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Inertia Tensor edit

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Inertia Tensor. Lawrence Cohen 17:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

TY Inertia Tensor (talk) 07:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding edit

This Arbitration case has closed, and the final decision may be reviewed through the above link. Further to the relevant findings of fact, Waterboarding and all closely-related pages are subject to article probation (full remedy); editors working on Waterboarding, or closely related pages, may be subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator, whereby any edits by that editor which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, may result in a block. (full remedy).

Should any user subject to an editing restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block length shall increase to one year (full enforcement). Before such restrictions are enacted on an editor, he or she must be issued with a warning containing a link to the decision.

For the Arbitration Committee,
AGK (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply