hello,
it is better to talk straight and give the truth about what is being done on Wikipedia (it's a recent phenomenon). If there is deliberate attempt to present misinformation it is better to point it out than asking for a polite discussion. Also Wikipedia loses its purpose if it cannot disseminate the right information, be an open source of information, and handle criticisms of its editors! if there are complaints of propaganda being done then it must be checked for that instead of trying to indirectly threaten the person complaining about it! as i pointed out the India- Saraswati valley civilisation part is written well, but one paragraph on the Saraswati river does present maligned information which is wrong and based on a questionable source! Just because the Admin has locked it (yes I read the reasons) doesn't mean the act will automatically be the right decision! I hope you understand my viewpoint without trying to shut me out!