May 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm WadeSimMiser. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Justin Lo with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, WadeSimMiser (talk) 17:06, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Centipede. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Centipede was changed by Ilikeweiner (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964596 on 2013-05-06T17:14:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Justin Lo with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. WadeSimMiser (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Centipede. WadeSimMiser (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply