Hi! Could you explain why you object to content being placed on the Auchinloch and Moodiesburn articles? I am in the process of removing the AfD nominations (I guess it's not the places themselves you have issue with, but with the Auchengeich mining disaster). Please expand on your rationale of "legal reasons". At present, the only potentially contentious content is on the Moodiesburn article (regarding the theft) but this is fully sourced and verifiable. matt (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2010

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not remove content without providing a reasonable rationale. Your edits do not explain why you have blanked sections. matt (talk) 14:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am being implied by this material. Is it even worth waiting for a legal outcome while this awful material remains? I will be forced to reveal my identity and kill myself. This is not a suicide threat, as per Wikipedia policy, just yet. Let's not have it come to that. I will not tolerate (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please ignore legal threats, my son is schizophrenic and has been banned from Wikipedia several times. His computer has now been confiscated, and there will be no more threats of this nature. Apologies (father). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.127.166 (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply