List of UFC Events edit

Hello. It's clearly obvious that you are engaging in an edit warrring behavior when it comes to that specific article. It amazes me that your claims of not coming out of the blue refer to the fact you were an editor way back ago. Being absent 4 years and reappearing like you did fits exactly what I said. While every help is always welcome and it improves articles (not always though), your edits do not. You ignore policies and simply starts bold reverts in an article. Why can't you gather a discussion on the talk page? Is it that hard? Those events (two of them) were major PPVs that were canceled with fight cards already finalized and tickets sold. The same goes for that most recent event. All of them are not simply planned events that were canceled quickly (like a March 3rd event this year). How can you explain the absence of two numbered events in that list? They can appear there as they are not listed on events, but represent events that were supposed to take place and canceled due to other motives and including them in a chronological order helps to keep track of past events overall. If you keep reverting with that simple argument and still ignores the BRD policy, we have a problem. I'm not going to engage in an edit war with you, but might have to fill a report if you keep that. Please start the discussion and we can find a consensus there. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

If I use the same modus operandi of yours, I'm supposed to believe that you agree with me as you sent no reply here, right? Luckily I'm not like that. By the way, this is not a one-on-one discussion. You're the only one wanting to change that, so you're the one supposed to get the users to discuss as they didn't have the same opinion of yours (otherwise it would have happened before). My single opinion does not stand as consensus, nor gives you ammu to decide how to act. So another removal of content on your part will consist of edit war. I'll report you if it comes to that. Call people to that talk page discussion and until something is decidedthe page stays the same. That's how Wikipedia deals with those things. You should read a little bit more about the site policies. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 19:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply