I invented "it's not you, it's me"
Media coverage of the Arab–Israeli conflict
editBoth of your sources fail WP:RS, it should have been obvious when you read about them calling one group a militant group and the other source calling the populist party neo-nazis. Passionless -Talk 21:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see how the fact that a mainstream publication calls a group 'militant' means it is not a reliable source. That's not one of the criteria for reliable sources I read.
- Please be WP:CIVIL on talk pages, especially over something as controversial as this. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 02:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Other accounts?
editMay I ask if you have ever edited Wikipedia under another account name? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 23:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- you may, and no. I invented "it's not you, it's me" (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. I just noticed a rather unusual editing pattern, with a 4 year gap, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 23:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- I stared editing in my HS junior year, then went to college and had more important stuff to do. Now I'm back... I invented "it's not you, it's me" (talk)
- Thank you. I just noticed a rather unusual editing pattern, with a 4 year gap, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 23:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
2015 in Israel
editNice to see we can end up on the same side of a dispute, with the "usual suspects" on the other side. Anyway, I invented it's not you, it's me sounds like the title of a love poem, and a rather defensive one; good to see you're holding your ground, be it against me.Arminden (talk) 06:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Arminden
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Your recent edits
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hounding
editOne of the responsibilities of admins is to monitor the activities of disruptive editors. I'd much rather be adding new content but such is life. Zerotalk 23:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- You're one of the most disruptive editors around. Like I said - keep it up, and you'll find yourself at AE. I'm keeping track. I invented "it's not you, it's me" (talk) 23:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Shanghai Sally
editIs this you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shanghai_Sally --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:49, 1 March 2015 (UTC)