I WOS A CHOC

November 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 10:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

@Longhair: Yes , but what was reverted ? I WOS A CHOC (talk) 10:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

You've asked 5 questions or so in around 10 minutes, then used the live help feature to mention nobody has answered one of your questions. You're showing signs of trolling and if that's the case it needs to stop or you'll be blocked for doing so. -- Longhair\^talk 10:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Longhair\^talk 10:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I WOS A CHOC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked just because I haven't edited anything yet ? How do you know I will never edit anything ? I am interested in soccer so I had thought of updating players' statistics after matchdays . How will I do it now ?

Decline reason:

Per SPI confirmation. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can i just ask how you understood how to present a barnstar to another editor you've never dealt with before, minutes after arriving, yet felt the need to ask all those other questions, 5 in 10 minutes or so, and activate the live help feature at your talk page. Sounds like you really wanna help, and fast. Or you're trolling, and I'm going with latter for now. -- Longhair\^talk 11:03, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, and further, they should appeal under their original account. ——SerialNumber54129 11:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

I have edited for Wikipedia earlier , though without an account . And I have seen a logo like a heart before on user pages , and I learnt what they were by clicking on them , and I have seen those "barnstar" things earlier on user pages . I was looking through the teahouse and he had listed some misbehaviours of admins openly at the top bit , I admired his bravery ; many of my earlier edits (when I didn't have an account because of fears of trolling) were reverted because they were " uncited " . I am sorry if I myself was trolling , I didn't realize it . I WOS A CHOC (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

And why on earth should I troll anyone ? I am not the sort who troll for fun . I WOS A CHOC (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

FYI the wikilove tab is only visible to logged-in editors, so if you did see it "before" it was under another account. FYI. ——SerialNumber54129 11:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anuchak, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Govvy (talk) 11:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)