April 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Babu Singh Kushwaha, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sadustu Tau (talk) 14:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Babu Singh Kushwaha, you may be blocked from editing. Sadustu Tau (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Constantly removing content for no reason.

edit

Hey there, I don't know why you keep removing content from Babu Singh Kushwaha for no reason. The information that you keep removing is sourced with verifiable sources. Contentious or not, without a talk page consensus or anything of that nature, those sources are appropriate and should remain. Sadustu Tau (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The allegation of involvement in Murder is false and baseless. The articles cited does not mention any chargesheet filed by any agency with respect to Murder Charges. Same is an attempt to malign and defame the reputation and attracts libel provisions regarding defamation, further the edit history of another user constantly updating the page and stating the Murder allegations i.e. adamantine123 is also constantly updating certain POLITICIANS OF BIHAR and UP pages along with constantly levelling baseless murder charges amounts to slander campaign at behest of other Political Persons. IHML (talk) 19:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Babu Singh Kushwaha. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  BusterD (talk) 18:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:JAP2024 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JAP2024. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 14:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply