I.sevriyski

February 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

The date 1396 has been debunked for a while now. First of all after the death of Ivan Sratsimir his was succeeded by his son Constantine II, which is without a doubt a fact. Even if we presume that all of Bulgaria fell in 1396, there was the “rebellion” of Constantine and Frujin that lasted till 1413. Tsar Constantine’s last possessions in Bulgaria were annexed by the Ottomans under Murad II in 1422, and shortly afterwards Constantine II died at the Serbian court on September 17, 1422. Furthermore in this same page it is written that the last Bulgarian capital is Vidin till 1422 and the last ruler is Constantine II till 1422, therefore it is against all logic to say that all of Bulgaria fell in 1396. Just because some “scholars” didn’t do their historical research properly, doesn’t mean we have to spread misinformation. And I'm not even mentioning the bulgarian Principality of Karvuna, that lasted till 1411 and Lovech which fell in 1462. I’m sorry, but history is not mathematics there is always some new data coming up, we cannot counting the spread of misinformation just because that’s the doctrine from the last 100 years. I.sevriyski (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Wikipedia works based on modern reliable English language secondary sources, not on personal opinions. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC)