Welcome!

Hello, Hypervalentanion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 02:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


June 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rising Star (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Biochemistry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Biochemistry was changed by Hypervalentanion (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891352 on 2014-06-23T03:20:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

What is the deal?

edit

Why do you keep adding "Also if a glycine amino acid undergoes methylation to a pseudo alanine amino acid, it is an indication of cancer methasis." to the Biochemistry article, as you have done seven times? My edit notes have told you that you cannot add unsourced material to Wikipedia as per WP:VERIFY. Please stop. If you need help, please ask for it! Jytdog (talk) 02:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

What's your deal! I have a phd in biochemistry and is posting common research information for others to use. My research comprises of methylation of nucleotides and amino acid.are you a biochemist? Okay didn't think so. So leave the info alone you have already changed it six times. Go find someone else to harass. You obviously have no life whatsoever!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypervalentanion (talkcontribs) 02:29, 3 July 2014‎ (UTC)Reply
OK, so thank you for finally talking back! It is great that you want to contribute to Wikipedia, but you need to know that although this is indeed "an encyclopedia that anyone can edit", there are rules to how things work around here. People left you notes above, and I wrote you edit notes. This is a community, and we talk to each other! One of the foundational rules here is WP:VERIFY which says that everything in Wikipedia needs a reliable source. No editor has any authority here because of who they are in the real world. "Hypervalentanion" could be twelve years or could be James Watson. We don't know, we don't want to know, and we are indeed forbidden from finding out by our very strong rules against "outing". What you added without a source could be as infantile as "Maddy likes to eat poop" or some other baloney. Or it could be really jerkish in a more subtle way, like: "Also if a lysine amino acid undergoes methylation, this activates transcription." Or it could be accurate. It is all the same - unsourced and delete-able. So slow down and learn how things work here! It is great that you want to contribute but if you don't take some time, you are just going to get frustrated. Jytdog (talk) 03:11, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


 

Your recent editing history at Biochemistry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 03:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply