November 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hugh Gannon, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Gannon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hugh Gannon

edit
 

The article Hugh Gannon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Author requests deletion

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vrenator (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hugh Gannon

edit

The page has been edited and contributed to by other users so should not be just blanked. I have proposed it for deletion instead. Vrenator (talk) 15:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply