Chivalry and Sorcery

edit

Hi, I notice in this edit [1] you mention some details about why a project to write a supplement for Chivalry and Sorcery failed. Wikipedia's content needs to be verifiable by third parties, so we can't include content that's supported solely by personal experience and we have to be particularly stringent in cases where the content is about living persons. Do you know of any external sources where this claim can be found? Bryan Derksen (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reply: Chivalry and Sorcery

edit

External sources, only by asking other involved parties to provide you with their copy of email correspondence. It wasn't bruited about publically if that is what you mean. Have changed my entry merely to say that the project happened, but did not come to fruition hurcheon (talk)

User and user talk pages

edit

I've just noticed that someone's been posting talk-type stuff on your main user page. You might want to move that stuff over into the talk page here or simply delete it outright. Just in case the "officiousness" of those red hand icons might have implied they were in some way special or unremovable. Most people use their user page as a mini-biography to describe their interests and areas of knowledge, having those complaints there instead seems like it might cast you in an undeserved light as a troublemaker. :) See Wikipedia:User_page for more information. Bryan Derksen (talk) 17:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply