Humaniphilon
You can all expect good old ordinary respect and casual but reasonably intelligent responses from me here. I look forward to interacting with the community, but don't go out of your way. Irrelevancies will be reverted with respect and good will. Ordinary conversation/comments are welcome. --Humaniphilon (talk) 17:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
September 2012 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Response edit
I was surprised I've been blocked, but the history of edit-warring re Tachash makes it understandable (if I had been involved before, I might have thought the same thing as blocker/admin, because I admit it looks suspect).
Note that the block was initiated immediately following the ref to "blue skins" with citation to Septuagint, and not before. This could indicate an agenda per blocker/s—but maybe not. The history of edit-warring at Talk:Tachash seems to indicate that this is the central "flash-point" of contention.
The footnote ref Septuagint edit I submitted was in fact intended to be my last edit to the article, so the block is after the fact. I was looking up something else when I saw the note "You have messages (last change)" (actually my last change was m to a different article). This said, I don't feel a need to appeal, so don't worry about it. You guys got along without me before "Sydney Tomack" and I think you'll do fine without me now. I wish you well. --Humaniphilon (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sidney Tomack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sidney Tomack, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sidney Tomack, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sidney Tomack, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sidney Tomack, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sidney Tomack edit
Hello, Humaniphilon. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sidney Tomack".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm talk 11:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)