December 2019 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kiefer Sutherland, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. robertsky (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kiefer Sutherland, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization Talk 04:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you continue to make this change without having achieved consensus on the article's Talk page, you will be blocked from editing. Enough is enough. General Ization Talk 04:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

With all due respect. Are you even listening to me. I'm also a wikipedia user. First of all the term English-Canadian means Canadians of English descent. And I've covered it all up. Look it up on the talk page. And second. If you are not going to pay attention? Why threatening me?. So now please change it back. Hughes Anderson (talk) 00:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Various alternatives were being discussed on the article's Talk page. The only editor proposing or supporting the idea of changing his nationality to "Canadian" only was you. There is no consensus for your edit. I will not change it back, and if you do, I will take you to the Edit Warring noticeboard where you can make your case. I'm done discussing it with you. General Ization Talk 00:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well. Wikipedia is not just about people who do what they want. I think you know that better than me. The term 'English-Canadian' makes no sense. But since a bunch of people who don't have the sense to do the right thing, agrees with something. You people ignore the authentic facts and do what the majority says. I'm requesting you to change it back. I'll appreciate that. And might as well support you. You know better. Dont listen to them. Please let it stay Canadian. I'm still showing you respect. Hughes Anderson (talk) 01:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Are you even listening sir? Hughes Anderson (talk) 01:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Read the last sentence of my response above. General Ization Talk 16:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Discretionary Sanctions edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 03:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply