1

Copyright violation in St. Thomas Residential School edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on St. Thomas Residential School, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because St. Thomas Residential School is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting St. Thomas Residential School, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:FileA-joseph.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:FileA-joseph.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:50, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Malankara Association&Malankara Varghese Murder Case edit

Please do not unnecessarily create pages. These pages wont serve any purpose. Improve existing articles by elaborating or think about creating pages about institutions, monasteries, churches etc. Creating contentious pages wont serve the purpose of an encyclopedia. These are too local and litigious topics to be in wikipedia.Thanks. Am nominating both for deletion.Eldhoz (talk) 11:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The artcle Mar Thoma I till Mar Thoma X is poorly sourced and without much substance, read about them and improve the articles by adding more contents, I will help you, if need be. Adding contentious topics will invite revert wars, and highlight people and institutions in bad light.Eldhoz (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ashwin, you do not have to come in various IP's and amend the page. It is bad to publish, a murder case about someone in wikipedia. Think about the relatives of the murdered person... If the person, is a well known person, then okay. Do make a page of Malankara Varghese and mention, all these details their, but opening a page called "Malankara Varghese Murder Case" is making wikipedia substandard. Your location is trivandrum and all the IPs which you use are from same computer. Do not indulge in sockpuppety.Eldhoz (talk) 10:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Alexander Joseph edit

As you know, this article was deleted through a valid deletion process. Through your IP address you asked for it to be undeleted, which refused. You recreated it anyway without addressing the concerns at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Joseph. Please don't do this again. Dougweller (talk) 09:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply