April 2012

edit
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Potter (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Columbus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Downton Abbey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Cullen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ollie

edit

If you really cared about the article you would discuss and plan an expansion of the development information. I do not like removing work like that - but the fact is you have walked in and destabilized an article that pass a good article assessment. Plot updates should be kept as brief as possible, take a step back and summarize what Ollie did in four episodes and write a sentence or two. Provide episode citations or episode guides hosted by official websites, news and other reputable reporting sites - this backs up the plot information inclued. As for all the in depth information, reserve it, for the development section. Using interviews and news sources you can build an accurate account of the development, reasons and storyline process that went into the storyline between Ollie and Tara. This will continue to provide the real world perspective that articles concerning fictional characters are meant to have on Wikipedia.Rain the 1 22:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply