Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The sandbox? Why would I want to play in the sand when writing an encyclopedia? I take umbrage to that. I have worth as a human being, worth beyond such tomfoolery as playing in the sand. I am indignant! HoaryHambone (talk) 22:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Indecent verbal prostitute

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Indecent verbal prostitute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2010

edit

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Indecent_verbal_prostitute, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Steamroller Assault (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ManiacalManatee for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Steamroller Assault (talk) 00:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC))Reply
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.