User talk:Hmwith/stats
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Hmwith in topic Interesting Evaluation
Bitch and complain about my findings here. =)
Damn those atheist bureaucrats!
editI guess I'll never be a bureacrat (not that I would have wanted to become one anyhow). Very interesting. :) Shalom (Hello • Peace) 13:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I found it extremely interesting, and that's why I published it. I compared males to females, as well, but those graphs showed little difference, so I found no reason to add them. нмŵוτнτ 16:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Interesting Evaluation
editNot very surprizing, based on my purely unscientific observations of folks. A more rigourous evaluation might be nice also....in your copious free time.....and include the amount of folks in the decline to state category. Thanks for the interesing stuff! --Rocksanddirt 18:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- I doubt a more rigorous evaluation would be likely to happen, as I'm a college student with tons of work. I mean, it was as scientific as any research in my situation would be, with limited resources and time. I mean, I didn't completely fuck around. I'm a psych major. нмŵוτнτ 16:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- I totally understand, and was being a bit facetious with the free time crack. It's the sort of evaluation, that is going be inherantly difficult and fairly unreliable, as most people don't put all their affiliations on the user page. --Rocksanddirt 18:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, and even a poll would be unreliable, as there are many people who would not take it or people who wouldn't tell the truth. Nothing fool-proof. нмŵוτнτ 17:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- I totally understand, and was being a bit facetious with the free time crack. It's the sort of evaluation, that is going be inherantly difficult and fairly unreliable, as most people don't put all their affiliations on the user page. --Rocksanddirt 18:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- I doubt a more rigorous evaluation would be likely to happen, as I'm a college student with tons of work. I mean, it was as scientific as any research in my situation would be, with limited resources and time. I mean, I didn't completely fuck around. I'm a psych major. нмŵוτнτ 16:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
no polytheists?
editHow odd... how large was your sample? ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 14:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- A couple of hundred, so not massive. You have to put into consideration how many people chose not to state, though. That surely could have had to do with it. I'm thinking that atheists are the quickest to proclaim their beliefs, as well. нмŵוτнτ 16:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)