User talk:HighInBC/Archive 47
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hi. Per this log, you deleted File:Van Buren.JPG for being "an image with fair use tag but no fair use rationale for more than seven days". May I please have a chance to review the image (or at least its specific source) in order to decide whether or not it is a better image for the Anita Van Buren article than File:Anita Van Buren.jpg, and thus whether or not to ask for it to be restored so that the lack of a fair use rationale may be cured? If the mention of the source is inappropriate for public posting, please email it. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Hello, I have a vague memory of doing that over 5 years ago. The image I deleted was far inferior to the image you have compared it to, I think there is little value in restoring it since a better alternative has been found. Chillum (Need help? Ask me) 14:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
- Great, no harm done. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 04:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
The account 185.15.59.211 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) looks to be an unauthorized bot, or else an authorized bot which is editing contrary to the Wikipedia:Bot policy. (Specifically, it's editing while logged out, and thus it's not clear who is operating it and what its purpose is.) Its edit summaries link to the page User:HBC AIV helperbot/Legend, which lead me to believe it may be User:HBC AIV helperbot. Could you please investigate? —Psychonaut (talk) 13:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.