Herpetogenesis
| This is Herpetogenesis's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1 |
Thank you ! edit
Hello Herpetogenesis !
I want to thank you for the interest you provided to the ESG rating regulation. As I'm completely new to Wikipedia, it would be awesome to have a feedback on the overall article if you have time for a lost contributor trying her best hahah
Thank you again ;) yasszz 04:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Yasszz: My pleasure! I renamed the article so that it would be less confusing and more concise. The article looks good but perhaps overly essay-like. Other Wikipedia editors who know more about the subject would be able to give you better feedback. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 17:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) |
January 2024 edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Are you sure? Please check again edit
Herpetogenesis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm honestly surprised by this. Good work with the Icewhiz SPI blocks, but could an experienced sockpuppet hunter please do a behavioral check and take a look at what I've been editing? I can understand that sometimes a few innocent bystanders can get caught up in these SPI's.
I have no interest at all in Israel/Poland politics and history, or antisemitism topics. Since when have I participated in any Icewhiz-related edit wars? Everything that Icewhiz socks were interested in are of no interest to me at all. On the other hand, I'm actually quite obsessed with invertebrate species: https://xtools.wmcloud.org/pages/en.wikipedia.org/Herpetogenesis
Could someone run an actual behavioral check? A lot of public and shared IPs, or IPs from countries that may have small IP ranges. I've had to do a lot of editing from places with limited freedoms, where Wikipedia may be blocked or restricted.
Please check created articles, edited articles, interest areas, edit summaries, timecards, and other clues. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 14:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a checkuser block, meaning it is supported with private technical evidence(that even admins cannot see). If the wrong conclusion has been reached, you will need to provide an explanation as to why that might be. The topics about which you are editing is insufficient. 331dot (talk) 10:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.