Start

1954 FIFA World Cup Final edit

Hi Henry, thanks for getting in touch. I would first say that your initial action should not have been to simply re-add the YouTube sources. For one thing, that video broadcast is copyrighted and should not be linked to (see WP:YOUTUBE). Secondly, even though you're using YouTube to verify simple events rather than to support an analysis of the events, there must be other sources available to support your account of the game. It's not up to us to watch a game and decide what events were important, we should be using reliable secondary sources for that. – PeeJay 15:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yep, books that provide a secondary analysis of the game would be perfect, but a full video of the game would not. – PeeJay 16:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Even a short video would probably be subject to copyright. I don't know who holds the rights for the 1954 World Cup, but I would imagine FIFA holds the rights and so taking down links to the video would be prudent. As a free encyclopaedia, Wikipedia can't afford to get caught up in a legal battle with FIFA! – PeeJay 17:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
If the clip is on FIFA's own website, that would avoid the copyright issue, but it would still be a primary source, so according to WP:PRIMARY, it should be used sparingly. – PeeJay 20:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
By the way, putting the time of an incident in brackets after the description isn't really very good prose. Any chance you could work that into the text somehow? – PeeJay 20:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Henry Kaspar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Henry Kaspar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

1954 FIFA World Cup Final edit

Hello! I have manually reverted your latest edits as they contradicted WP:OR. Per WP:EW, the removal of adequately sourced content should first be discussed on the talk page to avoid edit warring. Happy editing! – Zsovar3 (talk) 14:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. You have a creative way of intepreting wikipedia policies ;-) I opened a discussion on the talk page to ensure consistency with WP:ROC, WP:TOPIC or WP:TOOMUCH. Let's discuss there - it should be possible to find consensus. ~~~~ Henry Kaspar (talk) 18:14, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply