Heaqwe
Do not blame evrybody around to be Serafin. You use it to keep and return to a German version. Germans!!!!! Stop insolting Dzierzon as he dislike you. This is a shovinistic and provocative act doing such thinks. I beleave you Germans are suprised that evrybody dislike you. Such actions are the reasons --Heaqwe (talk) 19:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jan Dzierżon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Dil Hoom Hoom Kare 20:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
This what looks for you unconstructive is the historical facts. On this article was from the beginning and most of the time. Please stop supporting German nationalistic excesses--Heaqwe (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
AN/I note
editYou have been reported to the administrators' noticeboard, the discussion is here. Skäpperöd (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have removed most of the Userpage content per WP:USER#NOT and WP:SOAP. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see why - it was just a discussion (of the sort that normally takes place on user talk pages, but it doesn't really matter which namespace we use).--Kotniski (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Um, yes it does; see WP:USER - the page is for the account to provide information about themselves, and hosting comments such as was the case here is likely to be misconstrued as representing the views of the editor (and, per WP:SOAP, are not appropriate). Put it this way - what happens when you put subject discussion on the article page...? LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- You're wikilawyering - you could at least have just moved the discussion to the user talk page instead of deleting it. Anyway, if editors can't state their views on their user pages, what are all those user boxes doing?--Kotniski (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Um, yes it does; see WP:USER - the page is for the account to provide information about themselves, and hosting comments such as was the case here is likely to be misconstrued as representing the views of the editor (and, per WP:SOAP, are not appropriate). Put it this way - what happens when you put subject discussion on the article page...? LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see why - it was just a discussion (of the sort that normally takes place on user talk pages, but it doesn't really matter which namespace we use).--Kotniski (talk) 13:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)