It's understandable to delete from lack of sources- otherwise, we can't be sure it's not an outright hoax. As for unpublished thought, Wikipedia is supposed to be a summary of existing information, like a print encyclopedia. The existing pulished sources are used to construct a summarizing article. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Monty Novotny

edit
 

The article Monty Novotny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noformation Talk 11:00, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply