Your edit in RSA (cryptosystem)

edit

I have reverted your edits in RSA (cryptosystem), because your assertion that RSA cryptosystem has been broken is wrong and not supported by the reference you have provided: The reference states clearly that the gap of security comes from the particular random number generator use by a particular implementation of RSA cryptosystem (the implementation by the company named RSA Security). This has nothing to do with the RSA cryptosystem by itself. I guess that your edit comes from a good faith confusion. However, if you continue to reinsert the wrong assertion that RSA cryptosystem has been broken, this will be WP: disruptive editing, and you may be blocked for editing. D.Lazard (talk) 23:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Interesting twist you put to it and good point. I noticed my error and my answer was here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_EC_DRBG