Hariharrajpurohit

Recent edit to Rajpurohit

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 13:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Rajpurohit, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 13:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajpurohit, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rajpurohit was changed by Hariharrajpurohit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877314 on 2014-04-12T13:20:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Rajpurohit. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

• Please could you take note of the information at WP:V regarding Wikipedia's verifiability requirements. I'm not at all sure why it is even significant that the community only has one MLA in Rajasthan, so you'll probably need to explain that also. Furthermore, unless you have a reliable source that shows that MLA self-identifies as being a member of the caste, we cannot include the information because of our policies regarding biographies of living people. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)