Hardeeps

January 2009

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Technical analysis. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. See WP:ELNO Quaeler (talk) 09:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to GNU Privacy Guard. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Quaeler (talk) 09:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Jumble, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Quaeler (talk) 09:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

All the above warnings were given on the same day, without giving me a chance to respond or understand. My presence on Wikipedia is not to SPAM or disrupt anything. I understand now that Wikipedia does not allow links to blogs. I will adhere. I spoke to Quaeler and understood the problem. Hardeeps (talk) 13:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)