User talk:Happyducks/Khosrow and Shirin

peer review

I really like the article and I find ir really interesting and well-written :)

The illustrations are also very pretty and the descriptions are good and complete, as well as concise. Alot of different details are described which is really good and lets the readers understand Ottoman artistic influence even better.

I think the organization if the article is also great an dlogical.

I would simply suggest going into but more if details with the analysis of each description if you find common interpretations of the details as we're not allowed to give our own analysis.

"that have came before.", I would just correct this to that have come before :)

I also suggest to maybe link pictures of actual Ottoman Architecture, to help the readers fully encapsulate your point!

It was truly a very interesting article!!!

Bandzvlad (talk) 03:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, everything was written well I just asked for more ratios on the last part of the wiki. 192.42.89.2 (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)