H.izzo25

Welcome!

Hello, H.izzo25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Diary of A Bad Man, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 22:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Diary of A Bad Man

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Diary of A Bad Man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 22:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Take u 2 da movies

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Take u 2 da movies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Dmol (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Would you like the article restored to your userspace so that you can work on it and get it reviewed by the community? There version that you presented neither asserted WP:Notability nor appeared to be Verifiable. I would appreciate if you don't take out frustration with this by vandalism. If you keep it up, we may have to prevent you from editing at all, and I personally would like to assume good faith, Sadads (talk) 10:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Also, a more specific comment on your article. Most of the time when something is released on youtube it is non-notable out of principle, unless it includes references from multiple newspapers or other significant and reliable news sources, Sadads (talk) 10:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Qwyrxian

You mistakenly left your message to me on my user page (User:Qwyrxian). When you want to communicate with other editors, please do so on their talk pages (for example, mine is User Talk:Qwyrxian). I moved your message there and responded to it in this section. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

I just read what you added to your user page. I strongly recommend you read my message, and the links I provided. The problem is not with vile or critical people here, its with the fact that you're trying to add stuff that fundamentally doesn't belong in Wikipedia. That is, it's not a matter of your work not being good enough, its the fact that the topics you've chosen to write about don't fit our rules for stand-alone articles in Wikipedia. Please do accept that we are working in good faith; Wikipedia is kind-of weird when you first get started. Again, I am happy to help if you have questions. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

I do not quite beliwve you guys are working in good faith and you need not be indirect, the problem is is a vile person, lets not generalise here. Critical not so much but vile most definitely yes. May i remind you as a student we are almost often told that wikipedia is the most unreliable source. Wikipedia's flaws are the responsibility of those who have been around much longer than i have. If this person wants to delete my article, thats fine by me, i dont believe in this "good faith" façade, a couple reforms could do wikipedia good. (talk)

If you continue to accuse others of acting in bad faith, or of being vile, you will end up being blocked. Wikipedia requires that people collaborate together in a civil manner. Just because you want to add info/articles to Wikipedia, and are doing so in good faith, that doesn't necessarily mean that the articles will/should be kept. It appears that Bangs (hip hop artist) is likely to be kept (although I'm personally still not sure it should be), but the individual song/video articles should not be, since they have not been the subject of multiple discussion in reliable, independent sources. That kind of documentation is necessary to have an article on Wikipedia, for any subject.

The best thing for you to do would be, rather than attacking other editors, to ask specific questions in order to figure out how things work here. I'm happy to help--really. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Bangs

If you think the Bangs article stay, you need to find reliable sources that have discussed him in detail. If you have such sources, please add them to the article (or, if you don't know how, describe them on the article's talk page and I'll help format them correctly). Without such sources, the article should be deleted; with them, the article should stay. Again, try asking questions or fixing the actual problems rather than insulting other users. I appreciate that you removed your attacking comment from the article, but you never should have put it there in the first place. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Replied on my talk page

Just FYI, I replied to your comments on my talk page. I moved your comments up one section so that they were with your previous comment (instead of in an unrelated section) in case you're looking for them. The key message though, is this: if you want to contribute to Wikipedia, and would like help doing so, I am happy to help you. I do not want you to be blocked, but I do want to make sure you're treating other users appropriately. Again, ask any questions that you have at any time. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Your OPPORTUNITY to either oppose or support Qwyrxian in his bid to become an administrator...

Hi, I understand you recently had some dealings with Qwyrxian, and I think, in doing so, you have the unique vantage point of telling us about whether you think he is qualified to become an administrator. So, I would like to hear what you have to say about Qwyrxian, and here's your chance to do that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Qwyrxian. CHEERS! Diligent007 (talk) 16:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)