Gwesley2

Speedy deletion of "The Professionals (hip-hop)"

A page you created, The Professionals (hip-hop), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 17:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The {{hangon}} template

If you use the {{hangon}} template on an article not listed for speedy deletion, that automatically lists it. I don't think you want that. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 18:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I am so utterly confused as to what I need to do. Please just show me what I need to keep this on Wikipedia. This page is only for the hip-hop group The Professionals. We are not infringing on anyone's copyrights and we are not planning to kill anyone or have any intentions for world domination. We just want to develop a page for this group.Gwesley2 (talk) 19:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Right now, the article is not listed for deletion, so you don't need to worry about anything. I did list the article for speedy deletion at first, but the concerns that made me do that have been resolved by further edits by you, so I withdrew. That's when I removed your first hangon template as well, which no longer served any purpose. However, I still think the notability of the group is not properly shown in the article, but not to the point where deletion should be considered, even through a process that involves discussion (such as Articles for Deletion).

Someone else might disagree with me, though, so your article needs sources. Rumors do not make an adequate article, so they should not be mentioned unless you can come up with a reliable source that makes it clear it's more than just a rumor.

For the technicalities of inline citations (which are strongly recommended), please consult How to cite sources. If you have further questions, you may ask them to an administrator. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 19:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey there!

This isn't a bot =D

I noticed that you might need some help and that you were a little confused. If you need any help let me know!

mboverload@ 03:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I just want to make sure that everything is legit for this page and that it wont be taken down. I've worked way too hard already. Gwesley2 (talk) 03:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Question: How do I make The Professionals appear when someone searches for the group under the title "The Professionals"? Gwesley2 (talk) 03:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

That MAY be more of an art than a science. First, I would put a link to The Professionals (hip-hop) on the The Professionals page. The search algorithm is completely automatic and I have no idea how it works exactly. mboverload@ 03:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Is there anywere in particular I should put it? Should it just be in the external links, or somewhere near the top of the page? By the way, do you see anything on the page that would lead to its deletion? Gwesley2 (talk) 03:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cd cover small.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cd cover small.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

{{hangon}} Ok, I really don't understand all of this and I've tried to be patient.

Speedy deletion of Image:PROS01 (small).JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:PROS01 (small).JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:PROS01 (small).JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:PROS CFMS.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:PROS CFMS.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:PROS CFMS.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Professionals (hip-hop)

The article The Professionals (hip-hop) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce significant coverage in demonstrably independent and reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 17:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:PROS 02.JPG

The file File:PROS 02.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

file with unclear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)