Guaseppe

January 2024

Hello, I'm ThaddeusSholto. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Superpermutation have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, my name is Giuseppe Guarino and I wanted to let you know that I have worked on my article for almost a year. I also exchanged several emails with other authors mentioned on the page, such as Greg Egan. My result is important and deserves to be known. I found a recursive algorithm to achieve the same result as Greg Egan. This means that it can easily be used in devices with little processing memory such as smartphones. It may be of interest to computer scientists and mathematicians. It was absolutely not aimed at advertising. In any case, tell me how my contribution can be cited in Wikipedia and I will do it. Thanks for the reply Giuseppe Guarino 2001:B07:A56:CF1D:98FF:AF5B:400B:846A (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

I forgot to inform you that I tried to rewrite (on the superpermutation page of wikipedia) my result more clearly. I hope to have written properly. I invite you to read the article attached in the bibliography.

Thans, Giuseppe Guarino Guaseppe (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

What you are describing is a conflict of interest. The guidelines (at the link provided) state

Editors with a COI should follow Wikipedia policies and best practices scrupulously:

• you should disclose your COI when involved with affected articles;
• you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly;
• you may propose changes on talk pages (by using the {{edit COI}} template), or by posting a note at the COI noticeboard, so that they can be peer reviewed;
• you should put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly;
• you should not act as a reviewer of affected article(s) at AfC, new pages patrol or elsewhere;
• you should respect other editors by keeping discussions concise.

As this is your paper and you benefit from its dissemination, you shouldn't be adding it to any articles. You can suggest its inclusion on article talk pages but if the paper is as ground breaking and important as you believe it to be, certainly in time an uninvolved editor will add it him or herself. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't think I understand everything, forgive me. Can you help me write my result without making mistakes? Guaseppe (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

I am not going to add your paper to the article, if that is what you are asking. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't express myself well in English. I was asking you what I have to do to be able to add my article as the other authors have done and above all without making mistakes. Thank you 2001:B07:A56:CF1D:542F:47F8:EE7D:A24B (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Adding your own paper to Wikipedia articles would violate WP:COI. Simply put: you cannot. You can suggest your paper on the article talk page (Talk:Superpermutation) but that doesn't mean other editors will agree that it should be included. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Ok I will try this method. I just wanted to point out that the magazine that published the article is free, accessible to all for download. Is this something I need to specify in the discussion? 2001:B07:A56:CF1D:542F:47F8:EE7D:A24B (talk) 21:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)