User talk:Grizzbuzz/Global (cutlery)

Pre-move Review

Hello Grizzbuzz, I looked over your article history and see that you've done a bit to improve the article.

That being said, there is still work to be done, especially surrounding citations. Currently there is a "citation needed" link, also, there is a duplicate citation (1 and 2). Additionally, the categories seem to have fallen off from the original page. Finally, one of the key questions was whether this article followed the "neutral point of view".

Not that you haven't addressed any of these items, but I wanted to point to them specifically. Once you've cleaned everything up a bit more, I think you're good to go without checking back in (but of course you can).

When ready, you can Begin moving your work to Wikipedia! Please review the detailed explanation of the process on our class wiki.

While you are good to go, here are a few suggestions that most of the class' articles have room to improve upon. They may not all apply to your article and don't worry if they aren't all done, but these features can really make your additions shine:

• Refine the paragraph above the Table of Contents, remember it is the first thing that will be read. Considering adding a short description using this template.
• Find and add some relevant images. To make sure that you have permission to use the images, please review the WikiEdu module and read the Guide to Illustrating Wikipedia.
• Add a "See also" section of related articles by creating the heading and adding a list of internal links. Also consider adding a "External links" section, if there is somewhere relevant to link to.
• Try to find a relevant infobox or fill-in more details for the pre-existing one.
• Try to find any relevant category templates and WikiProjects. Often these were found at the bottom of the original article or on its "Talk page".
• Try to find more citations to add as references. Also, make sure to add them correctly and re-use instead of duplicate. Having a wide variety of sources can be just as important as the number.
• Clean up formatting and use some of the "wiki features". For instance, look for lists that could be sub headers, add internal links to places and concepts that readers may want more information about, consider whether "article elements" (e.g. infobox, table of contents, categories) are in the recommended order.
• Do some copy-editing. For instance, look for extra paragraphs and whitespace, inconsistent citation placement, extra periods, typos, etc.
• Review the WikiEdu Editing Guide and see if anything else stands out.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you for becoming a Wikipedia contributor!  一 Salt ♨️🚲🧂🧙‍♂️🐧🎓⚔️☠️ (talk) 08:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hey Grizzbuzz, I did a peer review on your article! Here is the link, good job! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Grizzbuzz/Global_(cutlery)/Chuma45_Peer_Review#Overall_evaluation Chuma45 (talk) 04:14, 16 February 2020 (UTC)