GreenForests (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
for scientific editing on wikipedia
Decline reason:
Autoblock working as intended. Now blocked directly. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
GreenForests (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
scientific editing of wikipedia for environmental conservation, and the survival of humanity and Nature GreenForests (talk) 15:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is not for righting great wrongs- and in any event, this does not address the reason for the block. You need to return to your original account to request unblock. I am declining this request. If you make additional requests without addressing the reason for the block, you will lose access to this page too. 331dot (talk) 15:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
GreenForests (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
scientific editing of wikipedia for environmental conservation, and the survival of humanity and Nature, are definitely not disruptive or illegitimate nor vandalistic or abusive. scientific editing of wikipedia for environmental conservation, and the survival of humanity and Nature should be appreciated by wikipedia and not rejected. Does wikipedia find it difficult to respect a scientific view on environment and nature conservation. please talk then to the United Nations but not to me GreenForests (talk) 08:12, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You haven't addressed your use of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 09:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As you have declined to address the reason for the block and return to your original account to do so, I am removing talk page access. If you do not have talk page access on your original account, you will need to use WP:UTRS once your request is declined. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)