Gravyknife
April 2013
edit
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GroundRisk. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Edit summaries
editIf you want to discuss things with other editors, please use the appropriate talk page, rather than leaving messages in edit summaries. Edit summaries are for explaining what was done in a particular edit. Dricherby (talk) 22:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of GroundRisk (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC) |
The article Semantic infiltration has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Created by blocked sock that uses Wikipedia to push a POV. I originally limited myself to recommending severe cuts to the article, as the topic existed in reliable sources, but I've now come to think that we would be better served with WP:TNT, since almost no sources in the article meet our standards and it appears still to be full of original synthesis. Let a competent and neutral user handle the topic if he or she so desires.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)