November 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Domdeparis. I noticed that you recently removed content from Italian invasion of France without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dom from Paris (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of St. Quentin (1557), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Request for unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grav-Leo02 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've been blocked by the user Nick-D for sockpuppetry. I didn't got advised by anyone for this and i'm not sockpuppeting anyone Grav-Leo02 (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account has been continuing the edits of blocked Kuru666 (talk · contribs) who has also been block evading via IP editing. Nick-D (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
But i'm not Kuru666
When asked if they had had another account before this one this editor claimed to have edited with an account for 2 days, 2 years ago [1] but on their 2nd mainspace edit [2] they showed quite advanced editing skills such as piping and citation and on their 6th mainspace edit they were making very complicated edits to infoboxes [3] that were identical to edits made by Kuru666 and various IP users that took over when Kuru666 was blocked. Dom from Paris (talk) 08:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

But i'm not him, i've just took the source that Kuru666 put in because it was acceptable, i checked online.

The admin who reviewed your unblock request has indicated that check user evidence shows that both accounts are identical. If you wish to be unblocked I would suggest that you make the request from the puppet master account (Kuru666) and make an appeal that doesn't simply deny the evidence. You might like to read Wikipedia:Appealing a block#Types of appeal #2 "Appeals for clemency". Dom from Paris (talk) 13:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply