Goelvineet
August 2020
edit
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:OpIndia for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 18:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- What happened to democratization of Knowledge? Goelvineet (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:OpIndia. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 18:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- So Larry was right about wikipedia hijacked by Islamist and Radicals. Goelvineet (talk) 11:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
edit Please do not add or change content, as you did at Medha Patkar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- if Swaminathan editorial on times of India is reliable what it could be? Goelvineet (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's not an editorial, it's posted in their blog section. I'm not sure who Swaminathan is. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- That was publish as editorial. Even if it is blog, that Swaminathan's view is no longer reliable? Goelvineet (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Blogs aren't considered reliable sources unless it's authored by a subject-matter expert but even then it's not allowed in articles about living people. If you can source any of that to something with editorial oversight please do, otherwise it should be removed. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please refrain otherwise it will be reverted if edited. Goelvineet (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- I won't but someone else will as it doesn't comply with policies, I'm just telling you want they are. Read WP:BLP. If you keep reverting, it will be considered edit warring and some admin will block you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- I will reply to who ever edited. Swaminathan is still more reliable than any unknown wikipedia editor. Goelvineet (talk) 11:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- I won't but someone else will as it doesn't comply with policies, I'm just telling you want they are. Read WP:BLP. If you keep reverting, it will be considered edit warring and some admin will block you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please refrain otherwise it will be reverted if edited. Goelvineet (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Blogs aren't considered reliable sources unless it's authored by a subject-matter expert but even then it's not allowed in articles about living people. If you can source any of that to something with editorial oversight please do, otherwise it should be removed. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- That was publish as editorial. Even if it is blog, that Swaminathan's view is no longer reliable? Goelvineet (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's not an editorial, it's posted in their blog section. I'm not sure who Swaminathan is. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)