The article Melissa Goddard has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please don't cut and paste from press releases or promotional bios to Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Melissa Goddard appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. BelovedFreak 23:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello Georgieannsmythe, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Jminthorne (talk) 23:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Melissa Goddard, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. BelovedFreak 00:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jminthorne (talk) 02:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Melissa Goddard edit

 

The article Melissa Goddard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film producer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Henry and Roz Rogers edit

 

The article Henry and Roz Rogers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Many-years of fundamental content problems, culminating in this week's Talk:Henry C. Rogers#Merge proposal that there is actually no notable topic of these two people and no worthwhile content to move to that other article on the one of them that is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply